Cisco 300-135 Questions Answers

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
The fault condition is related to switch technology?

A. NTP
B. Switch-to-Switch Connectivity
C. Loop Prevention
D. Access Vlans
E. VLAN ACL Port ACL
F. Switch Virtual Interface
G. Port Security

Answer: D

Cisco 300-135 Question Answer

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of
this fault and answer the following questions.
On which device is the fault condition located?

A. R1
B. R2
C. R3
D. R4
E. DSW1
F. DSW2
G. ASW1

Answer: A



The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
The fault condition is related to which technology?

A. BGP
B. NTP
C. IP NAT
D. IPv4 OSPF Routing
E. IPv4 OSPF Redistribution
F. IPv6 OSPF Routing
G. IPv4 layer 3 security

Answer: A

Cisco 300-135 Question Answer

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
On which device is the fault condition located?
 
A. R1
B. R2
C. R3
D. R4
E. DSW1
F. DSW2
G. ASW1

Answer: A


The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
The fault condition is related to which technology?
 
A. BGP
B. NTP
C. IP NAT
D. IPv4 OSPF Routing
E. IPv4 OSPF Redistribution
F. IPv6 OSPF Routing
G. IPv4 layer 3 security

Answer: A

Apple's iPhone Fight Could Mark Tougher Privacy Stance For Tech

What began as a hand-to-hand conflict between the federal government and Apple through the encrypted iPhone of a murderer has turned into a confrontation with one of the strongest industries in the country on freedom of expression, consumer privacy and brands. global

And there are signs that this crack will deepen before it is patched.

In a unit show rarely seen in the technology industry, more than 30 companies-Google, Facebook, Microsoft, AT & T, Yahoo, Amazon, Twitter, Intel, Cisco Systems and others-filed amicus briefs in support of Apple in their opposition. to crack. an iPhone related to the San Bernardino murders. It is a formidable front in an industry often fractured by wars of intestinal products.

When, for example, is the last time that Apple, Google, Amazon and Facebook were on the same team?

The newfound unity among almost all major technology companies is a powerful counterweight to the government, which made conciliatory overtures at the RSA cybersecurity conference in San Francisco this week. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter emphasized the importance of a free and open Internet in a speech. Alphabet CEO Eric Schmidt was appointed to head a new Pentagon advisory board to drive Silicon Valley's innovation in the US military. UU

"I'm not a supporter of the back doors or a unique technical approach to a complex issue," Carter told an audience of mostly IT. That was a softer tone than the FBI, whose director began the warning week warning that technology was creating places where law enforcement could not go.

However, Apple, through strong public comments from CEO Tim Cook, a world-class legal team led by famed lawyer Ted Olson and his typical marketing wizardry, has persuaded / convinced / forced his technology brothers to take a stand equally hard on privacy.

The newly formed battle lines could usher in a new era of aggressive privacy policies by technology companies, which increasingly rely on their customers' personal data to earn business income. The broad scope of the case's consequences on privacy, cybersecurity, human rights violations and the ability of US companies to compete abroad backed Apple's argument, legal experts say.

"The FBI's interest in this narrow case overshadows a lot of other important American interests," says Jennifer Granick, director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society.

No less authority than the head of human rights of the United Nations, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, warned on Friday that the FBI risks "unlocking a Pandora's box" that could help authoritarian governments and endanger security of millions of people around the world.

Such warnings may deepen the public's growing concern about the government's efforts to unlock data on digital devices, particularly in criminal investigations, a skepticism fostered by Edward Snowden's disclosure of a powerful surveillance program by the National Security Agency .

"This conflict with the technology industry was inevitable," says Bill Snyder, visiting assistant professor at the Faculty of Law at Syracuse University. "If it were not for Apple, someone else would have taken the initiative" in a confrontation with law enforcement about privacy in a data driven society.

Perhaps the federal government miscalculated the industry's response when it made public its conflict with Apple. And maybe the proposals he made this week at a security conference in San Francisco were ignored by many in the technology community.

But the US government UU You should not discount yourself, in any way, in your search for a weakened iPhone to track down a terrorist act.

As Ahmed Ghappour, a law professor at the University of California-Hastings, told USA TODAY, the judicial system often sides with the government in public legal disputes with technology companies about user privacy.

"The government exposed a weakness in an Apple product (iPhone 5C), Apple does not address privacy or security," says David Cowan, partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, which oversees its investments in cybersecurity. "In the current world of daily cyberbullying, to build a secure system, you must welcome transparency and address vulnerabilities."

Cisco 300-135 Question Answer

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, and FHRP services, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
The fault condition is related to which technology?

A. NTP
B. Switch-to-Switch Connectivity
C. Access Vlans
D. Port Security
E. VLAN ACL / Port ACL
F. Switch Virtual Interface

Answer: B


The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, and FHRP services, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions.
What is the solution to the fault condition?

A. In Configuration mode, using the interface port-channel 13 command, then configure switchport trunk allowed vlan none followed by switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,200 commands.
B. In Configuration mode, using the interface port-channel 13, port-channel 23, then configure switchport trunk none allowed vlan none followed by switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,200 commands.
C. In Configuration mode, using the interface port-channel 23 command, then configure switchport trunk allowed vlan none followed by switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,200 commands.
D. In Configuration mode, using the interface port-channel 23, port-channel, then configure switchport trunk allowed vlan none followed by switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,200 commands.

Answer: B

Internet Users In India To Double By 2021: Cisco

NEW DELHI: Digital transformation will take India's internet users from 373 million (28 pct of population) in 2016 to 829 million (59 pct of the Indian population) in 2021, global networking giant Cisco said on Friday.


According to Cisco's "Visual Networking Index (VNI) Complete Forecast", there will be two billion networked devices in 2021 in India, up from 1.4 billion in 2016.


"Mobile networks, devices and connections in India are not only getting smarter in their computing capabilities but are also evolving from lower-generation network connectivity (2G) to higher-generation network connectivity (3G, 3.5G, and 4G or LTE)," Sanjay Kaul, Managing Director, Service Provider Business, Cisco India and SAARC, said in a statement.


"Combining device capabilities with faster, higher bandwidth and more intelligent networks is leading to wide adoption of high bandwidth data, video and advanced multimedia applications that contribute to increased mobile and Wi-Fi traffic," Kaul added.


The overall IP traffic is expected to grow four-fold from 2016 to 2021, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30 pct and reach 6.5 Exabytes of data per month in 2021, up from 1.7 Exabytes per month in 2016, Cisco said in its forecast.


According to the report, machine-to-machine (M2M) connections will represent 22 pct of the total two billion devices and connections and will account for five pct of IP traffic by 2021.


Advancements in IoT applications such as smart meters, package tracking, digital health monitors and a host of other next-generation M2M services is driving this incremental growth-nearly 21 pct increase in the next five years.


Video will continue to dominate IP traffic and overall internet traffic growth -- representing 76 pct of all internet traffic in 2021, up from 57 pct in 2016.


"India will reach 84 billion internet video minutes per month by 2021, which is one hundred and sixty thousand years of video per month, or about thirty two thousand video minutes every second," Cisco said in its forecast.

Cisco 300-135 Question Answer

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. What is the solution to the fault condition?

A. R1
B. R2
C. R3
D. R4
E. DSW1
F. DSW2
G. ASW1
H. ASW2

Answer: G


The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a `proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. The fault condition is related to switch technology?

A. NTP
B. Switch-to-Switch Connectivity
C. Loop Prevention
D. Access Vlans
E. VLAN ACL Port ACL
F. Switch Virtual Interface
G. Port Security

Answer: D